Module-scale simulation of forward osmosis module-part B: Modified Spiral-Wound
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v2i2.7998Keywords:
Forward osmosis, Module design, Modified spiral wound module, Concentration polarization, Dilution effectAbstract
Forward osmosis (FO) is an attractive technology that offers advantages especially for treatment of challenging feeds in comparison to other membrane technologies. Substantial developments of membrane material have been shown recently. To support further development of FO process, a larger scale study via membrane module development is required to accurately envisage the most critical factors to be exploited to realize the promises. In this study, we applied a mass-transfer model coupled with the mass conservation and area discretization to simulate the performance of modified spiral-wound (MSW) modules (10 sheets of 1x1m). The study focuses on the spatial flux profile in a full-scale module as function of operational mode: co- vs counter cross current and membrane orientations (active-layer facing feed (ALFS); solution and active layer facing draw solution, (ALDS)). Results show that all modes offer almost similar average flux of about 9-10 L/m2h, but the co-current flows have much higher flux ranges (≈43%). The latter is expected to worsen membrane fouling resistant due to mal distribution in hydraulic loading. An operation with counter current and ALFS and counter current flow is then recommended because it offer similar flux but lower spatial flux ranges (7%).
Downloads
References
Achilli, A., Cath, T. Y., Marchand, E. A., & Childress, A. E. (2009). The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination, 239(1-3), 10-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.022
Attarde, D., Jain, M., Chaudhary, K., & Gupta, S. K. (2015). Osmotically driven membrane processes by using a spiral wound module—Modeling, experimentation and numerical parameter estimation. Desalination, 361, 81-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.025
Bilad, M. R. (2016). Module-Scale Simulation of Forward Osmosis Module-Part A: Plate-and-Frame. Indonesian journal of science and technology, 1(2), 249-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v1i2.3810
Bilad, M. R. (2017). Membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment: principles, challanges and future research directions. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 97-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v2i1.5993
Bui, N. N., Arena, J. T., & McCutcheon, J. R. (2015). Proper accounting of mass transfer resistances in forward osmosis: Improving the accuracy of model predictions of structural parameter. Journal of membrane science, 492, 289-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.001
Cartinella, J. L., Cath, T. Y., Flynn, M. T., Miller, G. C., Hunter, K. W., & Childress, A. E. (2006). Removal of natural steroid hormones from wastewater using membrane contactor processes. Environmental science and technology, 40(23), 7381-7386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es060550i
Cath, T. Y., Childress, A. E., & Elimelech, M. (2006). Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of membrane science, 281(1), 70-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048
Cath, T. Y., Hancock, N. T., Lundin, C. D., Hoppe-Jones, C., & Drewes, J. E. (2010). A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. Journal of Membrane Science, 362(1), 417-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.056
Deshmukh, A., Yip, N. Y., Lin, S., & Elimelech, M. (2015). Desalination by forward osmosis: Identifying performance limiting parameters through module-scale modeling. Journal of membrane science, 491, 159-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.080
Gruber, M. F., Johnson, C. J., Tang, C. Y., Jensen, M. H., Yde, L., & Hélix-Nielsen, C. (2011). Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems. Journal of membrane science, 379(1), 488-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.022
Gu, B., Kim, D. Y., Kim, J. H., & Yang, D. R. (2011). Mathematical model of flat sheet membrane modules for FO process: Plate-and-frame module and spiral-wound module. Journal of membrane science, 379(1), 403-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.012
Jung, D. H., Lee, J., Lee, Y. G., Park, M., Lee, S., Yang, D. R., & Kim, J. H. (2011). Simulation of forward osmosis membrane process: Effect of membrane orientation and flow direction of feed and draw solutions. Desalination, 277(1), 83-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.001
Klaysom, C., Cath, T. Y., Depuydt, T., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2013). Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chemical society reviews, 42(16), 6959-6989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60051c
Lee, J., Kim, B., & Hong, S. (2014). Fouling distribution in forward osmosis membrane process. Journal of environmental sciences, 26(6), 1348-1354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60610-5
Lee, S., Boo, C., Elimelech, M., & Hong, S. (2010). Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). Journal of Membrane Science, 365(1), 34-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036
Li, X., Chou, S., Wang, R., Shi, L., Fang, W., Chaitra, G., ... & Fane, A. G. (2015). Nature gives the best solution for desalination: Aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with superior performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 494, 68-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.040
Mi, B., & Elimelech, M. (2010). Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. Journal of membrane science, 348(1), 337-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.021
Phuntsho, S., Hong, S., Elimelech, M., & Shon, H. K. (2014). Osmotic equilibrium in the forward osmosis process: modelling, experiments and implications for process performance. Journal of membrane science, 453, 240-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.009
Sulastri, A., & Rahmidar, L. (2016). Fabrication of Biomembrane from Banana Stem for Lead Removal. Indonesian journal of science and technology, 1(1), 115-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v1i1.2335
Tiraferri, A., Yip, N. Y., Straub, A. P., Castrillon, S. R. V., & Elimelech, M. (2013). A method for the simultaneous determination of transport and structural parameters of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of membrane science, 444, 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.023
Xu, Y., Peng, X., Tang, C. Y., Fu, Q. S., & Nie, S. (2010). Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module. Journal of Membrane Science, 348(1), 298-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.013
Yip, N. Y., Tiraferri, A., Phillip, W. A., Schiffman, J. D., & Elimelech, M. (2010). High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environmental science and technology, 44(10), 3812-3818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es1002555
Zhao, S., Zou, L., Tang, C. Y., & Mulcahy, D. (2012). Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. Journal of membrane science, 396, 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
