Membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment: principles, challanges and future research directions

Authors

  • Muhammad Roil Bilad Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak 32610, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v2i1.5993

Keywords:

Membrane bioreactor, Membrane fouling, Wastewater treatment, Dynamic membrane system

Abstract

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have recently become widely accepted as an advanced technology for treatment of domestic and industrial wastewaters. The objective of this review is to provide overview on MBR technology for wastewater treatment application. It includes discussions on the fundamental, core problems (membrane fouling), recent effective development approach (dynamic filtration systems) and future research direction of MBRs. Since MBRs integrate a conventional activated sludge process with membrane filtration, and both fundamental aspects are discussed first. Later, a comprehensive discussion about membrane fouling, the main problems in MBR, is provided, including fouling control strategies. The discussion on the MBR membranes and relation between membrane properties and MBR performance is also provided. This review also includes one of the most promising MBR technologies that specifically design to manage membrane fouling: dynamic filtration systems. Lastly, insight into an approach to address MBRs challenges and recent research and developments are provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Z., Cho, J., Lim, B. R., Song, K. G., & Ahn, K. H. (2007). Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 287(2), 211-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.036

Akram, A., & Stuckey, D. C. (2008). Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). Process biochemistry, 43(1), 93-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.10.020

AlMarzooqi, F. A., Bilad, M. R., Mansoor, B., & Arafat, H. A. (2016). A comparative study of image analysis and porometry techniques for characterization of porous membranes. Journal of materials science, 51(4), 2017-2032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9512-0

Altaee, A., Al-Rawajfeh, A. E., & Baek, Y. J. (2009). Application of vibratory system to improve the critical flux in submerged hollow fiber MF process. Separation science and technology, 45(1), 28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390903401796

Asatekin, A., Menniti, A., Kang, S., Elimelech, M., Morgenroth, E., & Mayes, A. M. (2006). Antifouling nanofiltration membranes for membrane bioreactors from self-assembling graft copolymers. Journal of membrane science, 285(1), 81-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.042

Bae, T. H., Kim, I. C., & Tak, T. M. (2006). Preparation and characterization of fouling-resistant TiO2 self-assembled nanocomposite membranes. Journal of membrane science, 275(1), 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.023

Bae, T. H., & Tak, T. M. (2005). Preparation of TiO2 self-assembled polymeric nanocomposite membranes and examination of their fouling mitigation effects in a membrane bioreactor system. Journal of membrane science, 266(1), 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.08.014

Beier, S. P., Guerra, M., Garde, A., & Jonsson, G. (2006). Dynamic microfiltration with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module: filtration of yeast suspensions. Journal of membrane science, 281(1), 281-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.051

Bilad, M. R., Arafat, H. A., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2014). Membrane technology in microalgae cultivation and harvesting: a review. Biotechnology advances, 32(7), 1283-1300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.008

Bilad, M. R., Marbelia, L., Laine, C., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2015). A PVC–silica mixed-matrix membrane (MMM) as novel type of membrane bioreactor (MBR) membrane. Journal of membrane science, 493, 19-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.074

Bilad, M. R., Mezohegyi, G., Declerck, P., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2012a). Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water research, 46(1), 63-72.

Bilad, M. R., Mezohegyi, G., Declerck, P., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2012b). Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water research, 46(1), 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.026

Bilad, M. R., Westbroek, P., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2011). Assessment and optimization of electrospun nanofiber-membranes in a membrane bioreactor (MBR). Journal of membrane science, 380(1), 181-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.003

Bilad, M. R. (2016). Module-Scale Simulation of Forward Osmosis Module-Part A: Plate-and-Frame. Indonesian journal of science and technology, 1(2), 249-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v1i2.3810

Braak, E., Alliet, M., Schetrite, S., & Albasi, C. (2011). Aeration and hydrodynamics in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of membrane science, 379(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.004

Chang, S., Fane, A. G., & Vigneswaran, S. (2002). Modeling and optimizing submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. AIChE journal, 48(10), 2203-2212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690481011

Chen, L., Gu, Y., Cao, C., Zhang, J., Ng, J. W., & Tang, C. (2014). Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment. Water research, 50, 114-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.009

Cho, B. D., & Fane, A. G. (2002). Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical flux operation of a membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 209(2), 391-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00321-6

Cho, J., Song, K. G., Yun, H., Ahn, K. H., Kim, J. Y., & Chung, T. H. (2005). Quantitative analysis of biological effect on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water science and technology, 51(6-7), 9-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0616

Choi, J. H., Dockko, S., Fukushi, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2002). A novel application of a submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF MBR) for wastewater treatment. Desalination, 146(1-3), 413-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00524-6

Choi, J. H., Fukushi, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2005). Comparison of treatment efficiency of submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactors using cellulose triacetate and polyamide membrane. Water science and technology, 51(6-7), 305-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0650

de la Torre, T., Mottschall, M., Lesjean, B., Drews, A., Iheanaetu, A., & Kraume, M. (2010). Filterability assessment in membrane bioreactors using an in-situ filtration test cell. Water science and technology, 61(11), 2809-2816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.084

Drews, A. (2010). Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. Journal of membrane science, 363(1), 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.046

Elimelech, M., Zhu, X., Childress, A. E., & Hong, S. (1997). Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of membrane science, 127(1), 101-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00351-1

Evenblij, H., Geilvoet, S., Van der Graaf, J. H. J. M., & Van der Roest, H. F. (2005). Filtration characterisation for assessing MBR performance: three cases compared. Desalination, 178(1-3), 115-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.005

Fane, A. G. (2011). Membranes and the water cycle: challenges and opportunities. Applied water science, 1(1-2), 3-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-011-0002-5

Fane, A. G., & Fell, C. J. D. (1987). A review of fouling and fouling control in ultrafiltration. Desalination, 62, 117-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(87)87013-3

Fang, H. H., & Shi, X. (2005). Pore fouling of microfiltration membranes by activated sludge. Journal of membrane science, 264(1), 161-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.029

Field, R. W., & Pearce, G. K. (2011). Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Advances in colloid and interface science, 164(1), 38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.12.008

Field, R. W., Wu, D., Howell, J. A., & Gupta, B. B. (1995). Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. Journal of membrane science, 100(3), 259-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00265-Z

Fuchs, W., Resch, C., Kernstock, M., Mayer, M., Schoeberl, P., & Braun, R. (2005). Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process. Water research, 39(5), 803-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.001

Gao, F., Li, C., Yang, Z. H., Zeng, G. M., Feng, L. J., Liu, J. Z., & Cai, H. W. (2016). Continuous microalgae cultivation in aquaculture wastewater by a membrane photobioreactor for biomass production and nutrients removal. Ecological engineering, 92, 55-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.046

Genkin, G., Waite, T. D., Fane, A. G., & Chang, S. (2006). The effect of vibration and coagulant addition on the filtration performance of submerged hollow fibre membranes. Journal of membrane science, 281(1), 726-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.048

Howell, J. A. (1995). Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. Journal of membrane science, 107(1-2), 165-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00114-R

Huyskens, C., Brauns, E., Van Hoof, E., & De Wever, H. (2008). A new method for the evaluation of the reversible and irreversible fouling propensity of MBR mixed liquor. Journal of membrane science, 323(1), 185-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.021

Hwang, B. K., Lee, W. N., Park, P. K., Lee, C. H., & Chang, I. S. (2007). Effect of membrane fouling reducer on cake structure and membrane permeability in membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 288(1), 149-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.032

Jaffrin, M. Y. (2008). Dynamic shear-enhanced membrane filtration: a review of rotating disks, rotating membranes and vibrating systems. Journal of membrane science, 324(1), 7-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.050

Judd, S. (2008). The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends in biotechnology, 26(2), 109-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005

Kharraz, J. A., Bilad, M. R., & Arafat, H. A. (2015). Simple and effective corrugation of PVDF membranes for enhanced MBR performance. Journal of membrane science, 475, 91-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.018

Kola, A., Ye, Y., Ho, A., Le-Clech, P., & Chen, V. (2012). Application of low frequency transverse vibration on fouling limitation in submerged hollow fibre membranes. Journal of membrane science, 409, 54-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.017

Kola, A., Ye, Y., Le-Clech, P., & Chen, V. (2014). Transverse vibration as novel membrane fouling mitigation strategy in anaerobic membrane bioreactor applications. Journal of membrane science, 455, 320-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.078

Komesli, O. T., Teschner, K., Hegemann, W., & Gokcay, C. F. (2007). Vacuum membrane applications in domestic wastewater reuse. Desalination, 215(1-3), 22-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.10.025

Kraume, M., Wedi, D., Schaller, J., Iversen, V., & Drews, A. (2009). Fouling in MBR: What use are lab investigations for full scale operation?. Desalination, 236(1-3), 94-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.055

Le Clech, P., Jefferson, B., Chang, I. S., & Judd, S. J. (2003). Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 227(1), 81-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.021

Le-Clech, P., Chen, V., & Fane, T. A. (2006). Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Journal of membrane science, 284(1), 17-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019

Lee, M., & Kim, J. (2009). Membrane autopsy to investigate CaCO3 scale formation in pilot‐scale, submerged membrane bioreactor treating calcium‐rich wastewater. Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology, 84(9), 1397-1404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2195

Le Roux, I., Krieg, H. M., Yeates, C. A., & Breytenbach, J. C. (2005). Use of chitosan as an antifouling agent in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 248(1), 127-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.10.005

Liao, B. Q., Bagley, D. M., Kraemer, H. E., Leppard, G. G., & Liss, S. N. (2004). A review of biofouling and its control in membrane separation bioreactors. Water environment research, 76(5), 425-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/106143004X151527

Low, S. C., Cheong, K. T., & Lim, H. L. (2009). A vibration membrane bioreactor. Desalination and Water Treatment, 5(1-3), 42-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.563

Marbelia, L., Bilad, M. R., Bertels, N., Laine, C., & Vankelecom, I. F. (2016). Ribbed PVC–silica mixed matrix membranes for membrane bioreactors. Journal of membrane science, 498, 315-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.017

Marbelia, L., Bilad, M. R., Passaris, I., Discart, V., Vandamme, D., Beuckels, A., Muylaert, K. & Vankelecom, I. F. (2014). Membrane photobioreactors for integrated microalgae cultivation and nutrient remediation of membrane bioreactors effluent. Bioresource technology, 163, 228-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.012

Melvin, S. D., & Leusch, F. D. (2016). Removal of trace organic contaminants from domestic wastewater: A meta-analysis comparison of sewage treatment technologies. Environment international, 92, 183-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.031

Meng, F., Chae, S. R., Drews, A., Kraume, M., Shin, H. S., & Yang, F. (2009). Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water research, 43(6), 1489-1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044

Meng, F., Liao, B., Liang, S., Yang, F., Zhang, H., & Song, L. (2010). Morphological visualization, componential characterization and microbiological identification of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Journal of membrane science, 361(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.006

Metzger, U., Le-Clech, P., Stuetz, R. M., Frimmel, F. H., & Chen, V. (2007). Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes. Journal of membrane science, 301(1), 180-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.016

Prasertkulsak, S., Chiemchaisri, C., Chiemchaisri, W., Itonaga, T., & Yamamoto, K. (2016). Removals of pharmaceutical compounds from hospital wastewater in membrane bioreactor operated under short hydraulic retention time. Chemosphere, 150, 624-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.031

Ramesh, A., Lee, D. J., & Lai, J. Y. (2007). Membrane biofouling by extracellular polymeric substances or soluble microbial products from membrane bioreactor sludge. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 74(3), 699-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0706-x

Ramesh, A., Lee, D. J., Wang, M. L., Hsu, J. P., Juang, R. S., Hwang, K. J., Liu, J.C., & Tseng, S. J. (2006). Biofouling in membrane bioreactor. Separation science and technology, 41(7), 1345-1370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390600633782

Rana, D., & Matsuura, T. (2010). Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chemical reviews, 110(4), 2448-2471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800208y

Ratkovich, N., Chan, C. C. V., Bentzen, T. R., & Rasmussen, M. R. (2012). Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge. Water science and technology, 65(11), 2061-2070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.106

Ren, L., Ahn, Y., & Logan, B. E. (2014). A two-stage microbial fuel cell and anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (MFC-AFMBR) system for effective domestic wastewater treatment. Environmental science and technology, 48(7), 4199-4206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es500737m

Rosenberger, S., & Kraume, M. (2002). Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors. Desalination, 146(1), 373-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00515-5

Seo, G. T., Moon, B. H., Lee, T. S., Lim, T. J., & Kim, I. S. (2003). Non-woven fabric filter separation activated sludge reactor for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water science and technology, 47(1), 133-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0035

Shannon, M. A., Bohn, P. W., Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J. G., Marinas, B. J., & Mayes, A. M. (2008). Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature, 452(7185), 301-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06599

Song, K. G., Kim, Y., & Ahn, K. H. (2008). Effect of coagulant addition on membrane fouling and nutrient removal in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 221(1-3), 467-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.107

Su, X., Tian, Y., Sun, Z., Lu, Y., & Li, Z. (2013). Performance of a combined system of microbial fuel cell and membrane bioreactor: wastewater treatment, sludge reduction, energy recovery and membrane fouling. Biosensors and bioelectronics, 49, 92-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.04.005

van der Gast, C. J., Jefferson, B., Reid, E., Robinson, T., Bailey, M. J., Judd, S. J., & Thompson, I. P. (2006). Bacterial diversity is determined by volume in membrane bioreactors. Environmental microbiology, 8(6), 1048-1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00996.x

van der Marel, P., Zwijnenburg, A., Kemperman, A., Wessling, M., Temmink, H., & van der Meer, W. (2010). Influence of membrane properties on fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of membrane science, 348(1), 66-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.054

van der Marel, P., Zwijnenburg, A., Kemperman, A., Wessling, M., Temmink, H., & van der Meer, W. (2009). An improved flux-step method to determine the critical flux and the critical flux for irreversibility in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of membrane science, 332(1), 24-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.046

Vrijenhoek, E. M., Hong, S., & Elimelech, M. (2001). Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of membrane science, 188(1), 115-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00376-3

Wang, W., Jung, Y. J., Kiso, Y., Yamada, T., & Min, K. S. (2006). Excess sludge reduction performance of an aerobic SBR process equipped with a submerged mesh filter unit. Process biochemistry, 41(4), 745-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.09.016

Wang, X., Chang, V. W., & Tang, C. Y. (2016). Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: Advances, challenges, and prospects for the future. Journal of membrane science, 504, 113-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.010

Wu, J., & Huang, X. (2008). Effect of dosing polymeric ferric sulfate on fouling characteristics, mixed liquor properties and performance in a long-term running membrane bioreactor. Separation and purification technology, 63(1), 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.033

Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Huang, S., Mai, S., Yang, C., Wang, X., & Zhou, Z. (2008). Effects of various factors on critical flux in submerged membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Separation and purification technology, 62(1), 56-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.016

Yoon, S. H., & Collins, J. H. (2006). A novel flux enhancing method for membrane bioreactor (MBR) process using polymer. Desalination, 191(1-3), 52-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.124

Yu, K., Wen, X., Bu, Q., & Xia, H. (2003). Critical flux enhancements with air sparging in axial hollow fibers cross-flow microfiltration of biologically treated wastewater. Journal of membrane science, 224(1), 69-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.001

Yu, H. Y., Xu, Z. K., Lei, H., Hu, M. X., & Yang, Q. (2007). Photoinduced graft polymerization of acrylamide on polypropylene microporous membranes for the improvement of antifouling characteristics in a submerged membrane-bioreactor. Separation and purification technology, 53(1), 119-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.07.002

Zhang, H. F., Sun, B. S., Zhao, X. H., & Gao, Z. H. (2008). Effect of ferric chloride on fouling in membrane bioreactor. Separation and purification technology, 63(2), 341-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.05.024

Zhang, J., Chua, H. C., Zhou, J., & Fane, A. G. (2006). Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of membrane science, 284(1), 54-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.06.022

Downloads

Published

2017-04-01

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

Membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment: principles, challanges and future research directions. (2017). Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 97-123. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v2i1.5993