The Relationship Between Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance

Authors

  • Hamidreza Salmani Mojaveri Department of Management and Economic, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran Author
  • Mohammadhadi Daftaribesheli Department of Accounting, Farvardin University, Iran Author
  • Amin Allahbakhsh Department of Management, Payam Noor University, Iran Author

Keywords:

Social performance, Return on assets, Returns on equity, Elimination sampling

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between social performance and corporate financial performance based on the information of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange - Iran. Today, economic entity has to identify the needs of their surrounding environment and community and in general interested parties to continue their survival and link with executive operation of the manufacturing of their products and by explaining the necessities of community provide the best services and achieve their organizational goals by selling more products. Overall, the process to identify community needs and interested parties and surrounding environment and provide services to them placed in social performance framework which is considered as the important issues to achieve success for organizations in today's competitive world. Therefore, we can say that the companies which do better their social functions financially might be in a desirable place than other competitor. In this study have been selected 90 companies of Tehran stock exchange based on elimination sampling and in order to investigate whether good social performance also leads to better financial performance. Financial variables are ROA and ROE and social variables contain five dimensions of Mark vinola model which obtain from tracking in financial statements and notes and based on score between -2 and +2. Finally, we conclude that there is no significant relationship between the social performance and corporate financial performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achrol, R. S. (1997). Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Toward a network paradigm. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 25(1), 56-71.

Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study. Accounting, organizations and society, 24(3), 189-204.

Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of management journal, 42(5), 488-506.

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business and society, 38(3), 268-295.

Chaffee, E. E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of management review, 10(1), 89-98.

Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22.

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of management review, 20(1), 92-117.

Collins, F., Holzmann, O., & MENDOZA, R. (1997). Strategy, budgeting, and crisis in Latin America. Accounting, organizations and society, 22(7), 669-689.

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management science, 32(5), 554-571.

Dittman, D. A., Hesford, J. W., & Potter, G. (2008). Managerial accounting in the hospitality industry. Handbooks of management accounting research, 3, 1353-1369.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management review, 20(1), 65-91.

Frow, N., Marginson, D., & Ogden, S. (2010). “Continuous” budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control. Accounting, organizations and society, 35(4), 444-461.

Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business history review, 76(01), 37-74.

Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.

Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and society, 36(1), 5-31.

Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of management journal, 42(5), 479-485.

Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among US firms. Journal of business ethics, 84(4), 497-527.

Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (1990). Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: A review and critique of theoretical perspectives. Journal of management, 16(2), 461-509.

Husted, B. W. (2000). A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Business and society, 39(1), 24-48.

Ibua, M. P. (2014). The influence of institutional factors and job related attitudes on the relationship between employee empowerment and performance of public universities in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Jardine, C., Hrudey, S., Shortreed, J., Craig, L., Krewski, D., Furgal, C., & McColl, S. (2003). Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Journal of toxicology and environmental health part B: Critical reviews, 6(6), 569-718.

Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. The Journal of marketing, 53-70.

Lenz, R. T. (1981). ‘Determinants’ of organizational performance: An interdisciplinary review. Strategic management journal, 2(2), 131-154.

Letiche, J. M. (2010). Transforming sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of policy modeling, 32(2), 163-175.

Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of business ethics, 87(1), 71-89.

McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management journal, 31(4), 854-872.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.

Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 34(1), 63-73.

Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic management journal, 6(3), 257-272.

Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 19(2), 228-255.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.

Pateman, H. A. (2015). The role of strategic intent in collaboration: knowledge creation and transfer in the Australian logistics industry: part A (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania).

Pearce, J. L., Stevenson, W. B., & Perry, J. L. (1985). Managerial compensation based on organizational performance: A time series analysis of the effects of merit pay. Academy of management journal, 28(2), 261-278.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review, 80(12), 56-68.

Putra, Z. A. (2016). Use of Process Simulation for Plant Debottlenecking. Indonesian journal of science and technology, 1(1), 74-81.

Roman, R. M., Hayibor, S., & Agle, B. R. (1999). The relationship between social and financial performance repainting a portrait. Business and society, 38(1), 109-125.

Shin, M. (2004). A framework for evaluating economics of knowledge management systems. Information and management, 42(1), 179-196.

Simons, R. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic management journal, 12(1), 49-62.

Sovacool, B. K. (2009). Rejecting renewables: The socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States. Energy policy, 37(11), 4500-4513.

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 27-43.

Teasdale, J. D. (1983). Negative thinking in depression: Cause, effect, or reciprocal relationship?. Advances in behaviour research and therapy, 5(1), 3-25.

Verschoor, C. C. (1998). A study of the link between a corporation's financial performance and its commitment to ethics. Journal of business ethics, 17(13), 1509-1516.

Von Zedtwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research policy, 31(4), 569-588.

Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

The Relationship Between Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance. (2016). Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 1(2), 216-231. https://ijost.upi.edu/index.php/ijost/article/view/153